Tags

, ,

“People are too complex and the gospel too rich for a philosophy of ‘one size fits all’. The gospel is beautifully and wisely diverse in its message. That it cannot be reduced to a formula is clear in the varying ways in which Jesus addressed His message to different people (e.g. Samaritan woman, Rich Young Ruler, Nicodemus, woman caught in adultery, etc.)

The same is true of the Apostles, (e.g. Paul with the Athenians, before Felix, before Agrippa). Given their examples, shouldn’t we resist the temptation to limit what we mean by "gospel" to something more restrictive and more formulaic than what they demonstrated? There are occasions when in preaching the gospel free grace should stand alone. There are other occasions when in addition to grace law must be emphasized. There are other times when the cost of discipleship, or repentance, or warnings of judgment must be underscored if we are faithfully to communicate the whole gospel…

"Grace," narrowly constructed and understood, is not the whole gospel. If we only preach "grace" we are not preaching as Jesus and the Apostles preached, and indeed we betray their message. It is in this sense that we can preach "too much grace," that is, if by preaching only the graciousness of the gospel we neglect the cost. Our responsibility is to proclaim not grace but the gospel. Grace is vital to the gospel but the gospel is more than grace.”

- Terry Johnson, Sonship: An Adequate Psychology of Experience?