He was later acquited in a higher instance of court. He never served a single day in prison.
The first instance of court i Sweden has as a deciding assembly: One judge and four politicians, the latter representing the people. They often, as for exsample the American jurors, lack the nessessary skill to perform a correct ruling. In Sweden you (almost) automatically have the right to appeal after losing in the first instance.
Therefore this video is incorrect as in “outdated”. You should not show this video as it missrepresent the Swedish judicial system.
That said, of course it is bad that a lower instance interpreted the law as being so restrictive against freedom of speach. All judicial systems are in some degree restrictive against freedom of speach, the American for example, since it often outlaws slander.
Before you comment, please know the rules of engagement. Do NOT expect a respone. You may or may not get one. You're comment may be trashed if you are discourteous, inflammatory, too long, off-topic or devisive in any way. Please be concise and on-topic, otherwise, you're comment will not be posted. It may be helpful if you first read the comment policy under the menu "About & Contact". Cancel reply
He was later acquited in a higher instance of court. He never served a single day in prison.
The first instance of court i Sweden has as a deciding assembly: One judge and four politicians, the latter representing the people. They often, as for exsample the American jurors, lack the nessessary skill to perform a correct ruling. In Sweden you (almost) automatically have the right to appeal after losing in the first instance.
Therefore this video is incorrect as in “outdated”. You should not show this video as it missrepresent the Swedish judicial system.
That said, of course it is bad that a lower instance interpreted the law as being so restrictive against freedom of speach. All judicial systems are in some degree restrictive against freedom of speach, the American for example, since it often outlaws slander.